Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX vs Atom C3508

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom C3508
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 11 Watt
1.12
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX
2025
96 cores / 192 threads, 350 Watt
43.81
+3812%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX outperforms Atom C3508 by a whopping 3812% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking256859
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Atomno data
Power efficiency3.854.84
DesignerIntelAMD
Manufacturerno dataTSMC
Architecture codenameGoldmont (2016−2017)Shimada Peak (2025)
Release date15 August 2017 (7 years ago)July 2025

Detailed specifications

Atom C3508 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)96
Threads4192
Base clock speed1.6 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz5.4 GHz
Multiplier16no data
L1 cache224 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache8 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data12x 70.6 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data99,780 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Atom C3508 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1310sTR5
Power consumption (TDP)11.5 Watt350 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom C3508 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
QuickAssist+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Atom C3508 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key+no data
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom C3508 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom C3508 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4: 1866DDR5
Maximum memory size256 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth29.871 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom C3508 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX.

PCIe version35.0
PCI Express lanes8136
USB revision3no data
Total number of SATA ports8no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN4x2.5/1 GBEno data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Atom C3508 1.12
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX 43.81
+3812%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Atom C3508 1796
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX 70438
+3822%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.12 43.81
Physical cores 4 96
Threads 4 192
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 11 Watt 350 Watt

Atom C3508 has 3081.8% lower power consumption.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX, on the other hand, has a 3811.6% higher aggregate performance score, 2300% more physical cores and 4700% more threads, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

The AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom C3508 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom C3508
Atom C3508
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom C3508 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Atom C3508 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.