Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 vs Atom C3508

VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom C3508
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 11 Watt
1.12
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350
2025
8 cores / 16 threads, 28 Watt
14.65
+1208%

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 outperforms Atom C3508 by a whopping 1208% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom C3508 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2451502
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Atomno data
Power efficiency9.4649.70
Architecture codenameGoldmont (2016−2017)Krackan Point (2025)
Release date15 August 2017 (7 years ago)6 January 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Atom C3508 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads416
Base clock speed1.6 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz5 GHz
Multiplier16no data
L1 cache224 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache8 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB8 MB
Chip lithography14 nm4 nm
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Atom C3508 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1310FP8
Power consumption (TDP)11.5 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom C3508 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
QuickAssist+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Atom C3508 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key+no data
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom C3508 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom C3508 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4: 1866DDR5, LPDDR5X
Maximum memory size256 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth29.871 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataRadeon 860M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom C3508 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350.

PCIe version34.0
PCI Express lanes816
USB revision3no data
Total number of SATA ports8no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN4x2.5/1 GBEno data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Atom C3508 1.12
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 14.65
+1208%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom C3508 1796
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 23473
+1207%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.12 14.65
Recency 15 August 2017 6 January 2025
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 4 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 11 Watt 28 Watt

Atom C3508 has 154.5% lower power consumption.

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350, on the other hand, has a 1208% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom C3508 in performance tests.

Be aware that Atom C3508 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom C3508
Atom C3508
AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom C3508 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Atom C3508 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.