Ultra 7 265T vs Atom C3508

Primary details

Comparing Atom C3508 and Core Ultra 7 265T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2382not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Atomno data
Power efficiency9.47no data
Architecture codenameGoldmont (2016−2017)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date15 August 2017 (7 years ago)January 2025

Detailed specifications

Atom C3508 and Core Ultra 7 265T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads420
Base clock speed1.6 GHz1.5 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz5.3 GHz
Multiplier16no data
L1 cache224 KB112 KB (per core)
L2 cache8 MB3 MB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm3 nm
Die sizeno data243 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Atom C3508 and Core Ultra 7 265T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA13101851
Power consumption (TDP)11.5 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom C3508 and Core Ultra 7 265T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
QuickAssist+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
TSX-+

Security technologies

Atom C3508 and Core Ultra 7 265T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB+no data
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key+no data
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom C3508 and Core Ultra 7 265T are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom C3508 and Core Ultra 7 265T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4: 1866DDR5
Maximum memory size256 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth29.871 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataArc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom C3508 and Core Ultra 7 265T.

PCIe version35.0
PCI Express lanes820
USB revision3no data
Total number of SATA ports8no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports8no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN4x2.5/1 GBEno data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 20
Threads 4 20
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 11 Watt 35 Watt

Atom C3508 has 218.2% lower power consumption.

Ultra 7 265T, on the other hand, has 400% more physical cores and 400% more threads, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Atom C3508 and Core Ultra 7 265T. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Atom C3508 is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 7 265T is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom C3508 and Core Ultra 7 265T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom C3508
Atom C3508
Intel Core Ultra 7 265T
Core Ultra 7 265T

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom C3508 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Core Ultra 7 265T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom C3508 or Core Ultra 7 265T, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.