Atom x7835FE vs C3508

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2657not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Atomno data
Power efficiency9.90no data
DesignerIntelIntel
Manufacturerno dataIntel
Architecture codenameGoldmont (2016−2017)Amston Lake (2024−2025)
Release date15 August 2017 (8 years ago)1 October 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$150

Detailed specifications

Atom C3508 and Atom x7835FE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed1.6 GHz1.3 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz3.6 GHz
Multiplier16no data
L1 cache224 KB96 KB (per core)
L2 cache8 MB2 MB (per module)
L3 cache8 MB6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Atom C3508 and Atom x7835FE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1310Intel BGA 1264
Power consumption (TDP)11.5 Watt12 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom C3508 and Atom x7835FE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
QuickAssist+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data

Security technologies

Atom C3508 and Atom x7835FE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Secure Boot+no data
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom C3508 and Atom x7835FE are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom C3508 and Atom x7835FE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4: 1866DDR4, DDR5, LPDDR5
Maximum memory size256 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth29.871 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics 32EU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom C3508 and Atom x7835FE.

PCIe version33.0
PCI Express lanes89
USB revision3no data
Total number of SATA ports8no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN4x2.5/1 GBEno data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 August 2017 1 October 2025
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 4 8
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 11 Watt 12 Watt

Atom C3508 has 9.1% lower power consumption.

Atom x7835FE, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Intel Atom C3508 and Intel Atom x7835FE. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Atom C3508 is a server/workstation processor while Atom x7835FE is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom C3508
Atom C3508
Intel Atom x7835FE
Atom x7835FE

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom C3508 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom x7835FE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Atom C3508 and Atom x7835FE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.