EPYC Embedded 8224P vs Atom C3308

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated224
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Atomno data
Power efficiencyno data7.36
DesignerIntelAMD
Manufacturerno dataTSMC
Architecture codenameGoldmont (2016−2017)Siena (2023−2024)
Release date15 August 2017 (8 years ago)18 September 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$32no data

Detailed specifications

Atom C3308 and EPYC Embedded 8224P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads248
Base clock speed1.6 GHz2.55 GHz
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz3 GHz
Multiplier16no data
L1 cache112 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache4 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm
Die sizeno data2x 73 mm2
Maximum core temperature89 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data75 °C
Number of transistorsno data17,750 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Atom C3308 and EPYC Embedded 8224P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1310SP6
Power consumption (TDP)9.5 Watt160 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom C3308 and EPYC Embedded 8224P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
QuickAssist+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Atom C3308 and EPYC Embedded 8224P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Secure Boot+no data
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom C3308 and EPYC Embedded 8224P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom C3308 and EPYC Embedded 8224P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4: 1866DDR5
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels1no data
Maximum memory bandwidth14.936 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom C3308 and EPYC Embedded 8224P.

PCIe version35.0
PCI Express lanes696
USB revision3no data
Total number of SATA ports6no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN4x2.5/1 GBEno data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 August 2017 18 September 2023
Physical cores 2 24
Threads 2 48
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 9 Watt 160 Watt

Atom C3308 has 1678% lower power consumption.

EPYC Embedded 8224P, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, 1100% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Intel Atom C3308 and AMD EPYC Embedded 8224P. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom C3308 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC Embedded 8224P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Atom C3308 and EPYC Embedded 8224P, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.