Athlon 3000G vs Atom C3308
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 1948 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 5.27 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Atom | AMD Athlon |
| Power efficiency | no data | 7.74 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Goldmont (2016−2017) | Zen+ (2018−2019) |
| Release date | 15 August 2017 (8 years ago) | 21 November 2019 (6 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $32 | $49 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Atom C3308 and Athlon 3000G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.1 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | PCIe 3.0 |
| Multiplier | 16 | 35 |
| L1 cache | 112 KB | 96K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | 4 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | no data | 209.78 mm2? |
| Maximum core temperature | 89 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 4,800 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Atom C3308 and Athlon 3000G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | FCBGA1310 | AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 9.5 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom C3308 and Athlon 3000G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| PowerNow | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| QuickAssist | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Atom C3308 and Athlon 3000G technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | + | no data |
| Secure Boot | + | no data |
| SGX | - | no data |
| OS Guard | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom C3308 and Athlon 3000G are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom C3308 and Athlon 3000G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4: 1866 | DDR4 Dual-channel |
| Maximum memory size | 128 GB | 64 GB? |
| Max memory channels | 1 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 14.936 GB/s | 42.671 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon Vega 3 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom C3308 and Athlon 3000G.
| PCIe version | 3 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 6 | 6 |
| USB revision | 3 | no data |
| Total number of SATA ports | 6 | no data |
| Number of USB ports | 8 | no data |
| Integrated LAN | 4x2.5/1 GBE | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 15 August 2017 | 21 November 2019 |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 9 Watt | 35 Watt |
Atom C3308 has 288.9% lower power consumption.
Athlon 3000G, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 100% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Intel Atom C3308 and AMD Athlon 3000G. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Atom C3308 is a server/workstation processor while Athlon 3000G is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
