Xeon E-2414 vs Atom 230
Primary details
Comparing Atom 230 and Xeon E-2414 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Intel Atom | no data |
| Architecture codename | Silverthorne (2008−2010) | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) |
| Release date | 2 April 2008 (16 years ago) | 14 December 2023 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $29 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Atom 230 and Xeon E-2414 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 0.1 GHz | 4.5 GHz |
| Bus type | FSB | no data |
| Bus rate | 533.33 MT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 12 | no data |
| L1 cache | 56 KB | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 12 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 25.9638 mm2 | 163 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 85 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 47 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Atom 230 and Xeon E-2414 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | PBGA437 | 1700 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 4 Watt | 55 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom 230 and Xeon E-2414. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | no data | + |
| AVX | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | no data | + |
Security technologies
Atom 230 and Xeon E-2414 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom 230 and Xeon E-2414 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom 230 and Xeon E-2414. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB | no data |
| ECC memory support | no data | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | - | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom 230 and Xeon E-2414.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 2 April 2008 | 14 December 2023 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 4 |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 4 Watt | 55 Watt |
Atom 230 has 1275% lower power consumption.
Xeon E-2414, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 15 years, 300% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 350% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Atom 230 and Xeon E-2414. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Atom 230 is a notebook processor while Xeon E-2414 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Atom 230 and Xeon E-2414, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
