Processor 300 vs Atom 230

VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom 230
2008
1 core / 2 threads, 4 Watt
0.11
Processor 300
2024
2 cores / 4 threads, 46 Watt
4.51
+4000%

Processor 300 outperforms Atom 230 by a whopping 4000% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom 230 and Processor 300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking33761319
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Atomno data
Power efficiency2.609.27
Architecture codenameSilverthorne (2008−2010)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date2 April 2008 (16 years ago)8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$29$82

Detailed specifications

Atom 230 and Processor 300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads24
Base clock speed1.6 GHz3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed0.1 GHz3.9 GHz
Bus typeFSBno data
Bus rate533.33 MT/sno data
Multiplier12no data
L1 cache56 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm10 nm
Die size25.9638 mm2163 mm2
Maximum core temperature85 °Cno data
Number of transistors47 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
VID voltage range0.9V-1.1625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Atom 230 and Processor 300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketPBGA4371700
Power consumption (TDP)4 Watt46 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom 230 and Processor 300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3no data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-+
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-+
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Atom 230 and Processor 300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom 230 and Processor 300 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom 230 and Processor 300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4, DDR5
Maximum memory size8 GBno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-Intel UHD Graphics 710

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom 230 and Processor 300.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom 230 0.11
Processor 300 4.51
+4000%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom 230 169
Processor 300 7160
+4137%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.11 4.51
Recency 2 April 2008 8 January 2024
Physical cores 1 2
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 45 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 46 Watt

Atom 230 has 1050% lower power consumption.

Processor 300, on the other hand, has a 4000% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 350% more advanced lithography process.

The Processor 300 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom 230 in performance tests.

Be aware that Atom 230 is a notebook processor while Processor 300 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom 230 and Processor 300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom 230
Atom 230
Intel Processor 300
Processor 300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 56 votes

Rate Atom 230 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 24 votes

Rate Processor 300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom 230 or Processor 300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.