Atom N450 vs 230

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom 230 and Atom N450 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel AtomIntel Atom
Architecture codenameSilverthorne (2008−2010)Pinetrail (2009−2010)
Release date1 March 2008 (16 years ago)21 December 2009 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$29$64
Current price$170 (5.9x MSRP)$348 (5.4x MSRP)

Detailed specifications

Atom 230 and Atom N450 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.6 GHz1.66 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz1.66 GHz
Bus support533 MHz533 MHz
L1 cache56 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB512 KB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die size26 mm266 mm2
Maximum core temperature85 °C100 °C
Number of transistors47 Million123 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage range0.9V-1.1625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Atom 230 and Atom N450 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketPBGA437FCBGA559
Power consumption (TDP)4 Watt5.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom 230 and Atom N450. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-+
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States-no data
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switching--
FSB parity-no data
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Atom 230 and Atom N450 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom 230 and Atom N450 are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x--

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom 230 and Atom N450. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR2
Maximum memory size8 GB2 GB
Max memory channelsno data1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-Intel GMA 3150

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Atom 230 169
Atom N450 203
+20.1%

N450 outperforms 230 by 20% in Passmark.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Atom 230 557
Atom N450 560
+0.5%

N450 outperforms 230 by 1% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Atom 230 851
Atom N450 865
+1.6%

N450 outperforms 230 by 2% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 2008 21 December 2009
Cost $29 $64
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 5 Watt

We couldn't decide between Atom 230 and Atom N450. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom 230 and Atom N450, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom 230
Atom 230
Intel Atom N450
Atom N450

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 51 vote

Rate Atom 230 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 162 votes

Rate Atom N450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom 230 or Atom N450, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.