Opteron 43CX EE vs Athlon XP-M 2500+
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Barton (2001−2004) | Seoul (2012) |
| Release date | January 2001 (24 years ago) | 4 December 2012 (13 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Athlon XP-M 2500+ and Opteron 43CX EE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.86 GHz | 3 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 192 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 4096 KB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 8192 KB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 101 mm2 | 315 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 63 million | 1,200 million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon XP-M 2500+ and Opteron 43CX EE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
| Socket | A | C32 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon XP-M 2500+ and Opteron 43CX EE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon XP-M 2500+ and Opteron 43CX EE are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon XP-M 2500+ and Opteron 43CX EE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 4 |
| Threads | 1 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 35 Watt |
Opteron 43CX EE has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 306.3% more advanced lithography process, and 28.6% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD Athlon XP-M 2500+ and AMD Opteron 43CX EE. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Athlon XP-M 2500+ is a notebook processor while Opteron 43CX EE is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
