Ultra 9 185H vs Athlon XP-M 2200+

VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon XP-M 2200+ and Core Ultra 9 185H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated316
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Athlon XP-MIntel Meteor Lake-H
Power efficiencyno data38.93
Architecture codenameBarton (2001−2004)Meteor Lake-H (2023)
Release date19 July 2004 (20 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$97$640

Detailed specifications

Athlon XP-M 2200+ and Core Ultra 9 185H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads122
Base clock speedno data3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed1.67 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus typeFSBno data
Bus rate266 MT/sno data
Multiplier12.5no data
L1 cache128 KB112 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography130 nmIntel 4 nm
Die size101 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data110 °C
Number of transistors54 Millionno data
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Athlon XP-M 2200+ and Core Ultra 9 185H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAFCBGA2049
Power consumption (TDP)27 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon XP-M 2200+ and Core Ultra 9 185H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
PowerNow+-
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
SIPP-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+
Supported AI Software Frameworks-OpenVINO™, WindowsML, ONNX RT

Security technologies

Athlon XP-M 2200+ and Core Ultra 9 185H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon XP-M 2200+ and Core Ultra 9 185H are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon XP-M 2200+ and Core Ultra 9 185H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5
Maximum memory size4 GB96 GB
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel® Arc™ graphics
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data2.35 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Athlon XP-M 2200+ and Core Ultra 9 185H integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data4

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Athlon XP-M 2200+ and Core Ultra 9 185H integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)
Max resolution over eDPno data3840x2400 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Athlon XP-M 2200+ and Core Ultra 9 185H integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12.2
OpenGLno data4.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon XP-M 2200+ and Core Ultra 9 185H.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data8
PCI supportno data5.0 and 4.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 July 2004 14 December 2023
Physical cores 1 16
Threads 1 22
Power consumption (TDP) 27 Watt 45 Watt

Athlon XP-M 2200+ has 66.7% lower power consumption.

Ultra 9 185H, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 19 years, and 1500% more physical cores and 2100% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Athlon XP-M 2200+ and Core Ultra 9 185H. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon XP-M 2200+ and Core Ultra 9 185H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon XP-M 2200+
Athlon XP-M 2200+
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
Core Ultra 9 185H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Athlon XP-M 2200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 367 votes

Rate Core Ultra 9 185H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon XP-M 2200+ or Core Ultra 9 185H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.