Ryzen 7 2700X vs Athlon XP-M 2000+
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 940 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 5.18 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD Athlon XP-M | AMD Ryzen 7 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 4.01 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | GlobalFoundries |
| Architecture codename | Barton (2001−2004) | Zen+ (2018−2019) |
| Release date | 17 June 2003 (22 years ago) | 13 April 2018 (8 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $134 | $329 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Athlon XP-M 2000+ and Ryzen 7 2700X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.7 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.53 GHz | 4.35 GHz |
| Bus type | FSB | no data |
| Bus rate | 266 MT/s | 4 × 8 GT/s |
| Multiplier | 11.5 | 37 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 768 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 4 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 16 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 12 nm |
| Die size | 101 mm2 | 213 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 54 Million | 4800 Million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon XP-M 2000+ and Ryzen 7 2700X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | A | AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 105 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon XP-M 2000+ and Ryzen 7 2700X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | SSE4.2, SSE4A, AMD-V, AES, AVX2, FMA3, SHA |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| PowerNow | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon XP-M 2000+ and Ryzen 7 2700X are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon XP-M 2000+ and Ryzen 7 2700X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 Dual-channel |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB | 64 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 46.933 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon XP-M 2000+ and Ryzen 7 2700X.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 20 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 17 June 2003 | 13 April 2018 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 8 |
| Threads | 1 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 105 Watt |
Athlon XP-M 2000+ has 320% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 7 2700X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 14 years, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 983% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between AMD Athlon XP-M 2000+ and AMD Ryzen 7 2700X. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Athlon XP-M 2000+ is a notebook processor while Ryzen 7 2700X is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
