Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 vs Athlon XP-M 1700+

VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon XP-M 1700+ and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated521
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Athlon XP-MAMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9)
Power efficiencyno data47.69
Architecture codenameK7 (2000−2004)Strix Point (Zen 5) (2024)
Release date12 March 2003 (21 year ago)1 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$123no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon XP-M 1700+ and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads116 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c
Boost clock speed1.47 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus typeFSBno data
Bus rate266 MT/s54 MHz
Multiplier11no data
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache256 KBno data
Chip lithography130 nm4 nm
Die size85 mm2no data
Number of transistors37 Millionno data
64 bit support-+

Compatibility

Information on Athlon XP-M 1700+ and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketSocket 563FP8
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon XP-M 1700+ and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataUSB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), Secure Processor, SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
PowerNow+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon XP-M 1700+ and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5
Maximum memory size4 GBno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 880M

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 March 2003 1 October 2024
Physical cores 1 8
Threads 1 16 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c
Chip lithography 130 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 28 Watt

Athlon XP-M 1700+ has 12% lower power consumption.

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 21 year, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 3150% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Athlon XP-M 1700+ and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon XP-M 1700+ and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon XP-M 1700+
Athlon XP-M 1700+
AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Athlon XP-M 1700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 2 votes

Rate Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon XP-M 1700+ or Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.