Ultra 9 295HX vs Athlon XP-M 1600+
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Athlon XP-M | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Architecture codename | K7 (2000−2004) | Arrow Lake-HX (2025) |
| Release date | 12 March 2003 (23 years ago) | no data |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $107 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of Athlon XP-M 1600+ and Core Ultra 9 295HX: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 24 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.4 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
| Bus type | FSB | no data |
| Bus rate | 266 MT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 10.5 | no data |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 256 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | no data |
| Die size | 85 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 37 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon XP-M 1600+ and Core Ultra 9 295HX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | Socket 563 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 55 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon XP-M 1600+ and Core Ultra 9 295HX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| PowerNow | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon XP-M 1600+ and Core Ultra 9 295HX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 24 |
| Threads | 1 | 24 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 55 Watt |
Athlon XP-M 1600+ has 120% lower power consumption.
Ultra 9 295HX, on the other hand, has 2300% more physical cores and 2300% more threads.
We couldn't decide between AMD Athlon XP-M 1600+ and Intel Core Ultra 9 295HX. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
