Athlon XP 2700+ vs Athlon XP 3200+

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon XP 3200+ and Athlon XP 2700+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameBarton (2001−2003)Thoroughbred (2001−2002)
Release dateJanuary 2001 (23 years ago)October 2002 (21 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$85
Current price$130 $9.95 (0.1x MSRP)

Detailed specifications

Athlon XP 3200+ and Athlon XP 2700+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz2.17 GHz
L1 cache128 KB128 KB
L2 cache512 KB256 KB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography130 nm130 nm
Die size101 mm280 mm2
Number of transistors63 million37 million
64 bit support--
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Athlon XP 3200+ and Athlon XP 2700+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAA
Power consumption (TDP)77 Watt68 Watt

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Athlon XP 3200+ 281
+9.8%
Athlon XP 2700+ 256

Athlon XP 3200+ outperforms Athlon XP 2700+ by 10% in Passmark.

Pros & cons summary


Power consumption (TDP) 77 Watt 68 Watt

We couldn't decide between Athlon XP 3200+ and Athlon XP 2700+. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon XP 3200+ and Athlon XP 2700+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon XP 3200+
Athlon XP 3200+
AMD Athlon XP 2700+
Athlon XP 2700+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 19 votes

Rate Athlon XP 3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 3 votes

Rate Athlon XP 2700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon XP 3200+ or Athlon XP 2700+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.