Xeon D-2795NT vs Athlon XP 3000+
Aggregate performance score
Xeon D-2795NT outperforms Athlon XP 3000+ by a whopping 10740% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3604 | 490 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Power efficiency | 0.09 | 6.24 |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Barton (2001−2004) | no data |
| Release date | January 2001 (25 years ago) | 1 January 2022 (4 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $78 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of Athlon XP 3000+ and Xeon D-2795NT: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 20 (Icosa-Core) |
| Performance-cores | no data | 20 |
| Threads | 1 | 40 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.17 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | no data |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 30 MB |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 101 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 63 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon XP 3000+ and Xeon D-2795NT compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | A | FCBGA2579 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 68 Watt | 110 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon XP 3000+ and Xeon D-2795NT. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| QuickAssist | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Athlon XP 3000+ and Xeon D-2795NT technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® SPS |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon XP 3000+ and Xeon D-2795NT are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon XP 3000+ and Xeon D-2795NT. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 1 TB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 4 |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon XP 3000+ and Xeon D-2795NT.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 32 |
| USB revision | no data | 3.0 |
| Total number of SATA ports | no data | 24 |
| Number of USB ports | no data | 4 |
| Integrated LAN | no data | + |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.15 | 16.26 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 20 |
| Threads | 1 | 40 |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 68 Watt | 110 Watt |
Athlon XP 3000+ has 62% lower power consumption.
Xeon D-2795NT, on the other hand, has a 10740% higher aggregate performance score, 1900% more physical cores and 3900% more threads, and a 1200% more advanced lithography process.
The Intel Xeon D-2795NT is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Athlon XP 3000+ in performance tests.
Note that Athlon XP 3000+ is a desktop processor while Xeon D-2795NT is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
