K6-III+ 450ACZ vs Athlon XP 2800+
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3605 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Power efficiency | 0.09 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Barton (2001−2004) | Sharptooth (2000) |
| Release date | January 2001 (25 years ago) | 18 April 2000 (26 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $140 |
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of Athlon XP 2800+ and K6-III+ 450ACZ: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 2.25 GHz | 0.45 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 64 KB |
| L2 cache | 512K | 256 KB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 180 nm |
| Die size | 101 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 85 °C |
| Number of transistors | 63 million | 21 million |
| 64 bit support | - | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon XP 2800+ and K6-III+ 450ACZ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | A | AMD Super Socket 7 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 74 Watt | 12 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon XP 2800+ and K6-III+ 450ACZ. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| PowerNow | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | N/A |
Pros & cons summary
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 180 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 74 Watt | 12 Watt |
Athlon XP 2800+ has a 38% more advanced lithography process.
K6-III+ 450ACZ, on the other hand, has 517% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD Athlon XP 2800+ and AMD K6-III+ 450ACZ. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Athlon XP 2800+ is a desktop processor while K6-III+ 450ACZ is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
