Apple M4 (8 cores) vs Athlon XP 2800+ DTR
Primary details
Comparing Athlon XP 2800+ DTR and M4 (8 cores) processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
Series | no data | Apple M4 |
Architecture codename | Barton (2001−2004) | no data |
Release date | January 2001 (24 years ago) | 28 October 2024 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Athlon XP 2800+ DTR and M4 (8 cores) basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
Threads | 1 | 8 |
Boost clock speed | 2.08 GHz | 4 GHz |
L1 cache | 128 KB | no data |
L2 cache | 512 KB | no data |
L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
Chip lithography | 130 nm | 3 nm |
Die size | 101 mm2 | no data |
Number of transistors | 63 million | no data |
64 bit support | - | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon XP 2800+ DTR and M4 (8 cores) compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
Socket | A | no data |
Power consumption (TDP) | 68 Watt | 5 Watt |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | Apple M4 8-core GPU |
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 1 | 8 |
Threads | 1 | 8 |
Chip lithography | 130 nm | 3 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 68 Watt | 5 Watt |
Apple M4 (8 cores) has 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, a 4233.3% more advanced lithography process, and 1260% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Athlon XP 2800+ DTR and M4 (8 cores). We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon XP 2800+ DTR and Apple M4 (8 cores), ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.