Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 vs Athlon XP 2400+

Aggregate performance score

Athlon XP 2400+
2002, $90
1 core / 1 thread, 68 Watt
0.13
Mobile Pentium 4 3.06
2003
1 core / 2 threads, 70 Watt
0.13

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking36443658
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Power efficiency0.080.08
DesignerAMDIntel
Architecture codenameThorton (2001−2003)Northwood (2002−2004)
Release dateAugust 2002 (23 years ago)June 2003 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$90no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon XP 2400+ and Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads12
Boost clock speed2 GHz3.07 GHz
L1 cache128 KB8 KB
L2 cache256 KB512 KB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography130 nm130 nm
Die size80 mm2131 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data74 °C
Number of transistors63 million55 million
64 bit support--
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon XP 2400+ and Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketA478
Power consumption (TDP)68 Watt70 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon XP 2400+ and Mobile Pentium 4 3.06. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon XP 2400+ and Mobile Pentium 4 3.06. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR1, DDR2

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Athlon XP 2400+ 0.13
Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 0.13

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Athlon XP 2400+ 234
+6.4%
Samples: 58
Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 220
Samples: 16

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Threads 1 2
Power consumption (TDP) 68 Watt 70 Watt

Athlon XP 2400+ has 3% lower power consumption.

Mobile Pentium 4 3.06, on the other hand, has 100% more threads.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between AMD Athlon XP 2400+ and Intel Mobile Pentium 4 3.06.

Note that Athlon XP 2400+ is a desktop processor while Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 56 votes

Rate Athlon XP 2400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 4 votes

Rate Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Athlon XP 2400+ and Mobile Pentium 4 3.06, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.