Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs Athlon XP 2200+

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

Comparing Athlon XP 2200+ and Iris Pro Graphics 580 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Iris Graphics
Architecture codenameThorton (2001−2003)Gen9
Release dateJanuary 2001 (23 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$85no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon XP 2200+ and Iris Pro Graphics 580 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)no data
Threads1no data
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz0.35 GHz
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache256 KBno data
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography130 nm14 nm0.014 μm 1.4e-5 mm
Die size80 mm2no data
Number of transistors63 millionno data
64 bit support--
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon XP 2200+ and Iris Pro Graphics 580 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAno data
Power consumption (TDP)68 Wattno data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon XP 2200+ and Iris Pro Graphics 580. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Maximum memory sizeno data65,536 MB 67,108,864 KB 68,719,476,736 B 0.0625 TiB 64 GB

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 130 nm 14 nm

Iris Pro Graphics 580 has a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Athlon XP 2200+ and Iris Pro Graphics 580. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Athlon XP 2200+ is a desktop processor while Iris Pro Graphics 580 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon XP 2200+ and Iris Pro Graphics 580, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon XP 2200+
Athlon XP 2200+
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
Iris Pro Graphics 580

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 29 votes

Rate Athlon XP 2200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 5 votes

Rate Iris Pro Graphics 580 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon XP 2200+ or Iris Pro Graphics 580, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.