Ryzen 7 2800H vs Athlon XP 2000+
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 7 2800H outperforms Athlon XP 2000+ by a whopping 4236% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3768 | 1563 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | AMD Ryzen 7 |
| Power efficiency | 0.07 | 13.16 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | GlobalFoundries |
| Architecture codename | Thorton (2001−2003) | Raven Ridge (Zen) (2018) |
| Release date | January 2002 (24 years ago) | 30 May 2018 (8 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $25 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of Athlon XP 2000+ and Ryzen 7 2800H: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.67 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Multiplier | no data | 33 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 128K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 4 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 180 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 150 mm2 | 246 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 95 °C |
| Number of transistors | 63 million | 4950 Million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon XP 2000+ and Ryzen 7 2800H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | A | FP5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 70 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon XP 2000+ and Ryzen 7 2800H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon XP 2000+ and Ryzen 7 2800H are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon XP 2000+ and Ryzen 7 2800H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 32 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 51.196 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 ( - 1300 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon XP 2000+ and Ryzen 7 2800H.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 12 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.11 | 4.77 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 4 |
| Threads | 1 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 180 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 70 Watt | 15 Watt |
Ryzen 7 2800H has a 4236% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, a 1186% more advanced lithography process, and 367% lower power consumption.
The AMD Ryzen 7 2800H is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Athlon XP 2000+ in performance tests.
Note that Athlon XP 2000+ is a desktop processor while Ryzen 7 2800H is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
