Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS vs Athlon XP 1900+
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS outperforms Athlon XP 1900+ by a whopping 10467% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3671 | 704 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | AMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040) |
| Power efficiency | 0.07 | 9.91 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Thoroughbred (2001−2002) | Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) |
| Release date | November 2001 (24 years ago) | 5 January 2023 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of Athlon XP 1900+ and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 4.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 384 KB |
| L2 cache | 256 KB | 6 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 16 MB |
| Chip lithography | 180 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | 150 mm2 | 178 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 37 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon XP 1900+ and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | A | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 68 Watt | 54 Watt |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon 760M ( - 2600 MHz) |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.12 | 12.68 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 6 |
| Threads | 1 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 180 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 68 Watt | 54 Watt |
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS has a 10467% higher aggregate performance score, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, a 4400% more advanced lithography process, and 26% lower power consumption.
The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Athlon XP 1900+ in performance tests.
Note that Athlon XP 1900+ is a desktop processor while Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
