Xeon Platinum 8360HL vs Athlon XP 1800+
Primary details
Comparing Athlon XP 1800+ and Xeon Platinum 8360HL processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Architecture codename | Thoroughbred (2001−2002) | Cooper Lake-SP (2021) |
| Release date | January 2001 (23 years ago) | 6 April 2021 (3 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $59 | no data |
| Current price | $38 (0.6x MSRP) | no data |
Detailed specifications
Athlon XP 1800+ and Xeon Platinum 8360HL basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 48 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.53 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 33 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 180 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 150 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 37 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon XP 1800+ and Xeon Platinum 8360HL compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 8 |
| Socket | A | FCLGA4189 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 66 Watt | 225 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon XP 1800+ and Xeon Platinum 8360HL. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | no data | + |
| AVX | no data | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | no data | + |
| Status | no data | Launched |
Security technologies
Athlon XP 1800+ and Xeon Platinum 8360HL technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon XP 1800+ and Xeon Platinum 8360HL are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon XP 1800+ and Xeon Platinum 8360HL. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 RDIMM |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 4.5 TB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 6 |
| ECC memory support | no data | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon XP 1800+ and Xeon Platinum 8360HL.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 48 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 24 |
| Threads | 1 | 48 |
| Chip lithography | 180 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 66 Watt | 225 Watt |
We couldn't decide between Athlon XP 1800+ and Xeon Platinum 8360HL. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Athlon XP 1800+ is a desktop processor while Xeon Platinum 8360HL is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon XP 1800+ and Xeon Platinum 8360HL, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
