Pentium 4 2.40 vs Athlon XP 1800+

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon XP 1800+
2001, $59
1 core / 1 thread, 66 Watt
0.11
+57.1%

Athlon XP 1800+ outperforms Pentium 4 2.40 by an impressive 57% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking36343676
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency0.180.07
DesignerAMDIntel
Architecture codenameThoroughbred (2001−2002)Prescott (2001−2005)
Release dateJanuary 2001 (24 years ago)March 2004 (21 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$59no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon XP 1800+ and Pentium 4 2.40 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Boost clock speed1.53 GHz2.4 GHz
L1 cache128 KB16 KB
L2 cache256 KB1 MB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography180 nm90 nm
Die size150 mm2109 mm2
Number of transistors37 million125 million
64 bit support--
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon XP 1800+ and Pentium 4 2.40 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketA478
Power consumption (TDP)66 Watt110 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon XP 1800+ and Pentium 4 2.40. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR1, DDR2

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Athlon XP 1800+ 0.11
+57.1%
Pentium 4 2.40 0.07

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Athlon XP 1800+ 195
+48.9%
Samples: 35
Pentium 4 2.40 131
Samples: 245

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.11 0.07
Chip lithography 180 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 66 Watt 110 Watt

Athlon XP 1800+ has a 57.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

Pentium 4 2.40, on the other hand, has a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The AMD Athlon XP 1800+ is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Pentium 4 2.40 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon XP 1800+
Athlon XP 1800+
Intel Pentium 4 2.40
Pentium 4 2.40

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 24 votes

Rate Athlon XP 1800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 59 votes

Rate Pentium 4 2.40 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Athlon XP 1800+ and Pentium 4 2.40, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.