EPYC Embedded 8434P vs Athlon XP 1700+
Primary details
Comparing Athlon XP 1700+ and EPYC Embedded 8434P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3358 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Power efficiency | 0.16 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Thoroughbred (2001−2002) | Siena (2023−2024) |
| Release date | October 2001 (23 years ago) | 1 October 2024 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Athlon XP 1700+ and EPYC Embedded 8434P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 48 (Octatetraconta-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 96 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.47 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 128 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 180 nm | 5 nm |
| Die size | 150 mm2 | 4x 73 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 75 °C |
| Number of transistors | 37 million | 35,500 million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon XP 1700+ and EPYC Embedded 8434P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | A | SP6 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 64 Watt | 200 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon XP 1700+ and EPYC Embedded 8434P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon XP 1700+ and EPYC Embedded 8434P are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon XP 1700+ and EPYC Embedded 8434P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon XP 1700+ and EPYC Embedded 8434P.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 96 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 48 |
| Threads | 1 | 96 |
| Chip lithography | 180 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 64 Watt | 200 Watt |
Athlon XP 1700+ has 212.5% lower power consumption.
EPYC Embedded 8434P, on the other hand, has 4700% more physical cores and 9500% more threads, and a 3500% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Athlon XP 1700+ and EPYC Embedded 8434P. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Athlon XP 1700+ is a desktop processor while EPYC Embedded 8434P is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon XP 1700+ and EPYC Embedded 8434P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
