Xeon 6325P vs Athlon X4 950
Primary details
Comparing Athlon X4 950 and Xeon 6325P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1886 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 3.66 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Power efficiency | 3.28 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) |
| Release date | 27 July 2017 (7 years ago) | 24 February 2025 (recently) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $60 | $281 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Athlon X4 950 and Xeon 6325P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 5.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 12 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 246 mm2 | 163 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 74 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,178 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon X4 950 and Xeon 6325P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | AM4 | 1700 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 55 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon X4 950 and Xeon 6325P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Security technologies
Athlon X4 950 and Xeon 6325P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon X4 950 and Xeon 6325P are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon X4 950 and Xeon 6325P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Dual-channel | DDR4, DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon X4 950 and Xeon 6325P.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 27 July 2017 | 24 February 2025 |
| Threads | 4 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 55 Watt |
Xeon 6325P has an age advantage of 7 years, 100% more threads, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 18.2% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD Athlon X4 950 and Intel Xeon 6325P. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Athlon X4 950 is a desktop processor while Xeon 6325P is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
