Xeon 6325P vs Athlon X4 950

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon X4 950
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
2.24
Xeon 6325P
2025
4 cores / 8 threads, 55 Watt
9.96
+345%

Xeon 6325P outperforms Athlon X4 950 by a whopping 345% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1971878
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.6676.54
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency3.32no data
DesignerAMDIntel
Manufacturerno dataIntel
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)
Release date27 July 2017 (7 years ago)24 February 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$60$281

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon 6325P has 1991% better value for money than Athlon X4 950.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Athlon X4 950 and Xeon 6325P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed3.5 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz5.2 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm10 nm
Die size246 mm2163 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Athlon X4 950 and Xeon 6325P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM41700
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt55 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon X4 950 and Xeon 6325P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Security technologies

Athlon X4 950 and Xeon 6325P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon X4 950 and Xeon 6325P are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon X4 950 and Xeon 6325P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR4, DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon X4 950 and Xeon 6325P.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Athlon X4 950 2.24
Xeon 6325P 9.96
+345%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Athlon X4 950 3602
Xeon 6325P 16013
+345%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.24 9.96
Recency 27 July 2017 24 February 2025
Threads 4 8
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 55 Watt

Xeon 6325P has a 344.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 100% more threads, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 18.2% lower power consumption.

The Intel Xeon 6325P is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Athlon X4 950 in performance tests.

Note that Athlon X4 950 is a desktop processor while Xeon 6325P is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon X4 950
Athlon X4 950
Intel Xeon 6325P
Xeon 6325P

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 302 votes

Rate Athlon X4 950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon 6325P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Athlon X4 950 and Xeon 6325P, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.