Core i3-12100 vs Athlon X4 950

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon X4 950
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
2.32
Core i3-12100
2022
4 cores / 8 threads, 60 Watt
8.76
+278%

Core i3-12100 outperforms Athlon X4 950 by a whopping 278% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon X4 950 and Core i3-12100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1711808
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.6643.14
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)Alder Lake-S (2022)
Release date27 July 2017 (6 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$60no data
Current price$52 (0.9x MSRP)$143

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i3-12100 has 1079% better value for money than Athlon X4 950.

Detailed specifications

Athlon X4 950 and Core i3-12100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed3.5 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz4.3 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size246 mm2163 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Athlon X4 950 and Core i3-12100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM4FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt60 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon X4 950 and Core i3-12100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
FMA+no data
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSXno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoringno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Statusno dataLaunched

Security technologies

Athlon X4 950 and Core i3-12100 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon X4 950 and Core i3-12100 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon X4 950 and Core i3-12100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data76.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics 730
Quick Sync Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.4 GHz
Execution Unitsno data24

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Athlon X4 950 and Core i3-12100 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data4

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Athlon X4 950 and Core i3-12100 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2160 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data5120 x 3200 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Athlon X4 950 and Core i3-12100 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon X4 950 and Core i3-12100.

PCIe versionno data5.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon X4 950 2.32
i3-12100 8.76
+278%

Core i3-12100 outperforms Athlon X4 950 by 278% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Athlon X4 950 3588
i3-12100 13553
+278%

Core i3-12100 outperforms Athlon X4 950 by 278% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Athlon X4 950 662
i3-12100 2150
+225%

Core i3-12100 outperforms Athlon X4 950 by 225% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Athlon X4 950 1639
i3-12100 6880
+320%

Core i3-12100 outperforms Athlon X4 950 by 320% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.32 8.76
Recency 27 July 2017 4 January 2022
Threads 4 8
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 60 Watt

The Core i3-12100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon X4 950 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon X4 950 and Core i3-12100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon X4 950
Athlon X4 950
Intel Core i3-12100
Core i3-12100

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 259 votes

Rate Athlon X4 950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 1503 votes

Rate Core i3-12100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon X4 950 or Core i3-12100, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.