Celeron G6900E vs Athlon X4 880K

VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon X4 880K
2015
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
2.29
Celeron G6900E
2022
2 cores / 2 threads, 46 Watt
2.67
+16.6%

Celeron G6900E outperforms Athlon X4 880K by a moderate 17% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon X4 880K and Celeron G6900E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking18571763
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency2.295.51
Architecture codenameGodaveri (2014−2016)Alder Lake-S (2022)
Release dateDecember 2015 (9 years ago)4 January 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon X4 880K and Celeron G6900E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed4 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz3 GHz
L1 cache256K80K (per core)
L2 cache4 MB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm10 nm
Die size245 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistors2,411 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Athlon X4 880K and Celeron G6900E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2+1700
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt46 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon X4 880K and Celeron G6900E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+

Security technologies

Athlon X4 880K and Celeron G6900E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon X4 880K and Celeron G6900E are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon X4 880K and Celeron G6900E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics 710

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon X4 880K and Celeron G6900E.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Athlon X4 880K 2.29
Celeron G6900E 2.67
+16.6%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon X4 880K 3663
Celeron G6900E 4272
+16.6%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Athlon X4 880K 598
Celeron G6900E 1561
+161%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Athlon X4 880K 1855
Celeron G6900E 2702
+45.7%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.29 2.67
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 46 Watt

Athlon X4 880K has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Celeron G6900E, on the other hand, has a 16.6% higher aggregate performance score, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 106.5% lower power consumption.

The Celeron G6900E is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon X4 880K in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon X4 880K
Athlon X4 880K
Intel Celeron G6900E
Celeron G6900E

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 57 votes

Rate Athlon X4 880K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 7 votes

Rate Celeron G6900E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Athlon X4 880K and Celeron G6900E, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.