Celeron G6900E vs Athlon X4 880K

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon X4 880K and Celeron G6900E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1682not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameGodaveri (2014−2018)Alder Lake-S (2022)
Release dateDecember 2015 (8 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Current price$160 no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon X4 880K and Celeron G6900E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed4 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz3 GHz
L1 cache256K80K (per core)
L2 cache4 MB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm10 nm
Die size245 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistors2,411 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Athlon X4 880K and Celeron G6900E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2+1700
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt46 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon X4 880K and Celeron G6900E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+no data
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSXno data+

Security technologies

Athlon X4 880K and Celeron G6900E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon X4 880K and Celeron G6900E are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon X4 880K and Celeron G6900E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics 710

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon X4 880K and Celeron G6900E.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Athlon X4 880K 598
Celeron G6900E 1559
+161%

Celeron G6900E outperforms Athlon X4 880K by 161% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Athlon X4 880K 1855
Celeron G6900E 2815
+51.8%

Celeron G6900E outperforms Athlon X4 880K by 52% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 46 Watt

We couldn't decide between Athlon X4 880K and Celeron G6900E. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon X4 880K and Celeron G6900E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon X4 880K
Athlon X4 880K
Intel Celeron G6900E
Celeron G6900E

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 38 votes

Rate Athlon X4 880K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 7 votes

Rate Celeron G6900E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon X4 880K or Celeron G6900E, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.