Athlon 5370 vs Athlon X4 880K

VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon X4 880K
2015
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
2.31
+92.5%
Athlon 5370
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 25 Watt
1.20

Athlon X4 880K outperforms Athlon 5370 by an impressive 93% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon X4 880K and Athlon 5370 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking18122354
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency2.304.54
Architecture codenameGodaveri (2014−2016)Kabini (2013−2014)
Release dateDecember 2015 (9 years ago)9 April 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon X4 880K and Athlon 5370 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed4 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz2.2 GHz
L1 cache256K256 KB
L2 cache4 MB2048 KB
Chip lithography28 nm28 nm
Die size245 mm2107 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data76 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C90 °C
Number of transistors2,411 millionno data
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Athlon X4 880K and Athlon 5370 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2+AM1
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon X4 880K and Athlon 5370. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+FMA4
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon X4 880K and Athlon 5370 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon X4 880K and Athlon 5370. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133DDR3-1600
Max memory channelsno data1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R3 Graphics
จำนวนพาธไลน์no data128
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Athlon X4 880K and Athlon 5370 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Athlon X4 880K and Athlon 5370 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon X4 880K and Athlon 5370.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes164

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon X4 880K 2.31
+92.5%
Athlon 5370 1.20

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon X4 880K 3663
+92.3%
Athlon 5370 1905

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.31 1.20
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 25 Watt

Athlon X4 880K has a 92.5% higher aggregate performance score.

Athlon 5370, on the other hand, has 280% lower power consumption.

The Athlon X4 880K is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 5370 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon X4 880K and Athlon 5370, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon X4 880K
Athlon X4 880K
AMD Athlon 5370
Athlon 5370

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 53 votes

Rate Athlon X4 880K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 14 votes

Rate Athlon 5370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon X4 880K or Athlon 5370, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.