Athlon 1300 vs Athlon X4 860K

VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon X4 860K and Athlon 1300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1847not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency2.15no data
Architecture codenameKaveri (2014−2015)Thunderbird B (2000−2001)
Release date12 August 2014 (10 years ago)21 March 2001 (23 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$318

Detailed specifications

Athlon X4 860K and Athlon 1300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speed3.7 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4 GHz1.3 GHz
L1 cache256K128 KB
L2 cache4 MB256 KB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm180 nm
Die size245 mm2120 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistors2,411 million37 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Athlon X4 860K and Athlon 1300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2+A
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt68 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon X4 860K and Athlon 1300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon X4 860K and Athlon 1300 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon X4 860K and Athlon 1300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133DDR1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon X4 860K and Athlon 1300.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 August 2014 21 March 2001
Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 28 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 68 Watt

Athlon X4 860K has an age advantage of 13 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

Athlon 1300, on the other hand, has 39.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Athlon X4 860K and Athlon 1300. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon X4 860K and Athlon 1300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon X4 860K
Athlon X4 860K
AMD Athlon 1300
Athlon 1300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 254 votes

Rate Athlon X4 860K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 7 votes

Rate Athlon 1300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon X4 860K or Athlon 1300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.