Xeon 6325P vs Athlon X4 850

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon X4 850
2015
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
1.65
Xeon 6325P
2025
4 cores / 8 threads, 55 Watt
9.96
+504%

Xeon 6325P outperforms Athlon X4 850 by a whopping 504% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2218878
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data76.54
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency2.4517.47
DesignerAMDIntel
ManufacturerGlobalFoundriesIntel
Architecture codenameGodaveri (2014−2016)Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)
Release dateJuly 2015 (9 years ago)24 February 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$281

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Athlon X4 850 and Xeon 6325P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed3.2 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz5.2 GHz
L1 cache256K80 KB (per core)
L2 cache4 MB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm10 nm
Die size245 mm2163 mm2
Number of transistors2,411 millionno data
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Athlon X4 850 and Xeon 6325P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2+1700
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt55 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon X4 850 and Xeon 6325P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Security technologies

Athlon X4 850 and Xeon 6325P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon X4 850 and Xeon 6325P are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon X4 850 and Xeon 6325P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133DDR4, DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon X4 850 and Xeon 6325P.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Athlon X4 850 1.65
Xeon 6325P 9.96
+504%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Athlon X4 850 2657
Xeon 6325P 16013
+503%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.65 9.96
Threads 4 8
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 55 Watt

Xeon 6325P has a 503.6% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more threads, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 18.2% lower power consumption.

The Intel Xeon 6325P is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Athlon X4 850 in performance tests.

Note that Athlon X4 850 is a desktop processor while Xeon 6325P is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon X4 850
Athlon X4 850
Intel Xeon 6325P
Xeon 6325P

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 7 votes

Rate Athlon X4 850 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon 6325P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Athlon X4 850 and Xeon 6325P, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.