Xeon E5507 vs Athlon X4 840
Aggregate performance score
Athlon X4 840 outperforms Xeon E5507 by an impressive 74% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2000 | 2470 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 0.11 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | 4x Athlon | no data |
| Power efficiency | 3.05 | 1.42 |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | GlobalFoundries | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Kaveri (2014−2015) | Gainestown (2009−2010) |
| Release date | August 2014 (10 years ago) | 16 March 2010 (15 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $457 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Athlon X4 840 and Xeon E5507 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 3.1 GHz | 2.26 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 0.27 GHz |
| L1 cache | 256K | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 4 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 245 mm2 | 263 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 76 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 2,411 million | 731 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon X4 840 and Xeon E5507 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
| Socket | Socket FM2+ | FCLGA1366 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 watt | 80 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon X4 840 and Xeon E5507. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | + |
| PAE | no data | 40 Bit |
Security technologies
Athlon X4 840 and Xeon E5507 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon X4 840 and Xeon E5507 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon X4 840 and Xeon E5507. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 144 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 3 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 19.2 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon X4 840 and Xeon E5507.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 2.07 | 1.19 |
| Recency | on August 2014 | 16 March 2010 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 80 Watt |
Athlon X4 840 has a 73.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 60.7% more advanced lithography process, and 23.1% lower power consumption.
The AMD Athlon X4 840 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon E5507 in performance tests.
Note that Athlon X4 840 is a desktop processor while Xeon E5507 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
