Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) vs Athlon X4 840

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon X4 840
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
2.15
+31.1%
Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W)
2009
4 cores / 4 threads, 125 Watt
1.64

Athlon X4 840 outperforms Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) by a substantial 31% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon X4 840 and Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking17821988
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.381.93
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Series4x Athlonno data
Architecture codenameKaveri (2014−2015)Deneb (2009−2011)
Release dateAugust 2014 (9 years ago)November 2009 (14 years ago)
Current price$23 $88

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Athlon X4 840 has 282% better value for money than Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W).

Detailed specifications

Athlon X4 840 and Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.1 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cache256K128 KB (per core)
L2 cache4 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cacheno data6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm45 nm
Die size245 mm2258 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistors2,411 million758 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierYesYes

Compatibility

Information on Athlon X4 840 and Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketSocket FM2+AM3
Power consumption (TDP)65 watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon X4 840 and Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W). You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+no data
FMA+no data
AVX+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon X4 840 and Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon X4 840 and Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W). Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon X4 840 and Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W).

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon X4 840 2.15
+31.1%
Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) 1.64

Athlon X4 840 outperforms Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) by 31% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Athlon X4 840 3319
+30.5%
Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) 2544

Athlon X4 840 outperforms Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) by 30% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.15 1.64
Chip lithography 28 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 125 Watt

The Athlon X4 840 is our recommended choice as it beats the Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon X4 840 and Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W), ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon X4 840
Athlon X4 840
AMD Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W)
Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W)

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 575 votes

Rate Athlon X4 840 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 597 votes

Rate Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon X4 840 or Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W), agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.