Pentium G5500 vs Athlon X4 840

Primary details

Comparing Athlon X4 840 and Pentium G5500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1869not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Series4x Athlonno data
Power efficiency3.04no data
Architecture codenameKaveri (2014−2015)Coffee Lake (2017−2019)
Release dateAugust 2014 (10 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon X4 840 and Pentium G5500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads4no data
Base clock speed3.1 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz3.8 GHz
L1 cache256K64 KB (per core)
L2 cache4 MB256 KB (per core)
L3 cacheno data6144 KB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm14 nm
Die size245 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C72 °C
Number of transistors2,411 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Athlon X4 840 and Pentium G5500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketSocket FM2+1151
Power consumption (TDP)65 watt51 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon X4 840 and Pentium G5500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+

Security technologies

Athlon X4 840 and Pentium G5500 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon X4 840 and Pentium G5500 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon X4 840 and Pentium G5500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon X4 840 and Pentium G5500.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 2
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 51 Watt

Athlon X4 840 has 100% more physical cores.

Pentium G5500, on the other hand, has a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 27.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Athlon X4 840 and Pentium G5500. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon X4 840 and Pentium G5500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon X4 840
Athlon X4 840
Intel Pentium G5500
Pentium G5500

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 613 votes

Rate Athlon X4 840 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 6 votes

Rate Pentium G5500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon X4 840 or Pentium G5500, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.