Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U vs Athlon X4 830

Primary details

Comparing Athlon X4 830 and Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1997not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency2.66no data
Architecture codenameKaveri (2014−2015)Hawk Point (2024)
Release dateFebruary 2015 (9 years ago)16 April 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon X4 830 and Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads412
Base clock speed3 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz4.9 GHz
L1 cache256K64 KB (per core)
L2 cache4 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm4 nm
Die size245 mm2178 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistors2,411 million25,000 million
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Athlon X4 830 and Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2+FP7
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon X4 830 and Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon X4 830 and Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon X4 830 and Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 760M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon X4 830 and Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes1620

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 6
Threads 4 12
Chip lithography 28 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 28 Watt

Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U has 50% more physical cores and 200% more threads, a 600% more advanced lithography process, and 132.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Athlon X4 830 and Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Athlon X4 830 is a desktop processor while Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon X4 830 and Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon X4 830
Athlon X4 830
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U
Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 20 votes

Rate Athlon X4 830 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 4 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon X4 830 or Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.