FX-4130 vs Athlon X4 760K

VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon X4 760K
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 100 Watt
1.87
+10%
FX-4130
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 125 Watt
1.70

Athlon X4 760K outperforms FX-4130 by a moderate 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon X4 760K and FX-4130 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking19912058
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.31
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.771.29
Architecture codenameRichland (2013−2014)Zambezi (2011−2012)
Release date1 June 2013 (11 years ago)27 August 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$112

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon X4 760K and FX-4130 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.8 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed4.1 GHz3.9 GHz
L1 cache192Kno data
L2 cache4 MB4096 KB
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size246 mm2315 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data70 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,303 million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
Unlocked multiplier++
P0 Vcore voltageno dataMin: 1.2875 V - Max: 1.4125 V

Compatibility

Information on Athlon X4 760K and FX-4130 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon X4 760K and FX-4130. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++
PowerNow+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon X4 760K and FX-4130 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon X4 760K and FX-4130. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1866DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon X4 760K and FX-4130.

PCIe version2.0n/a

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon X4 760K 1.87
+10%
FX-4130 1.70

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon X4 760K 2973
+10.3%
FX-4130 2696

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Athlon X4 760K 438
+5.8%
FX-4130 414

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Athlon X4 760K 1039
FX-4130 1066
+2.6%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.87 1.70
Recency 1 June 2013 27 August 2012
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 125 Watt

Athlon X4 760K has a 10% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 months, and 25% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Athlon X4 760K and FX-4130.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon X4 760K and FX-4130, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon X4 760K
Athlon X4 760K
AMD FX-4130
FX-4130

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 250 votes

Rate Athlon X4 760K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 174 votes

Rate FX-4130 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon X4 760K or FX-4130, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.