A6-7310 vs Athlon X4 760K

VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon X4 760K
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 100 Watt
1.87
+10.7%
A6-7310
2015
4 cores / 4 threads, 12 Watt
1.69

Athlon X4 760K outperforms A6-7310 by a moderate 11% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon X4 760K and A6-7310 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking19922062
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD A-Series
Power efficiency1.776.40
Architecture codenameRichland (2013−2014)Carrizo-L (2015)
Release date1 June 2013 (11 years ago)7 May 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon X4 760K and A6-7310 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.8 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.1 GHz2.4 GHz
L1 cache192Kno data
L2 cache4 MB2048 KB
Chip lithography32 nm28 nm
Die size246 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,303 million930 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Athlon X4 760K and A6-7310 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFM2FP4
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt12-25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon X4 760K and A6-7310. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, BMI1, F16C, AMD64, VT
AES-NI++
FMA+FMA4
AVX++
PowerNow++
PowerGating-+
VirusProtect-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon X4 760K and A6-7310 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon X4 760K and A6-7310. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1866DDR3L-1866
Max memory channelsno data1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R4 Graphics
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Athlon X4 760K and A6-7310 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Athlon X4 760K and A6-7310 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon X4 760K and A6-7310.

PCIe version2.02.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon X4 760K 1.87
+10.7%
A6-7310 1.69

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon X4 760K 2973
+10.6%
A6-7310 2689

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Athlon X4 760K 438
+92.1%
A6-7310 228

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Athlon X4 760K 1039
+75.5%
A6-7310 592

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.87 1.69
Recency 1 June 2013 7 May 2015
Chip lithography 32 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 12 Watt

Athlon X4 760K has a 10.7% higher aggregate performance score.

A6-7310, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 733.3% lower power consumption.

The Athlon X4 760K is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-7310 in performance tests.

Note that Athlon X4 760K is a desktop processor while A6-7310 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon X4 760K and A6-7310, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon X4 760K
Athlon X4 760K
AMD A6-7310
A6-7310

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 250 votes

Rate Athlon X4 760K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 514 votes

Rate A6-7310 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon X4 760K or A6-7310, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.