A10 Pro-7350B vs Athlon X4 750K

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon X4 750K
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 100 Watt
1.64
+54.7%

Athlon X4 750K outperforms A10 Pro-7350B by an impressive 55% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22422607
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Kaveri
Power efficiency0.692.36
DesignerAMDAMD
ManufacturerGlobalFoundriesno data
Architecture codenameTrinity (2012−2013)Kaveri (2014−2015)
Release date2 October 2012 (13 years ago)4 June 2014 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon X4 750K and A10 Pro-7350B basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.4 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3.3 GHz
L1 cache192Kno data
L2 cache4 MB (shared)4096 KB
Chip lithography32 nm28 nm
Die size246 mm2245 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,303 million2410 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Athlon X4 750K and A10 Pro-7350B compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFM2FP3
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt19 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon X4 750K and A10 Pro-7350B. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++
FRTC-+
TrueAudio-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
Out-of-band client management-+
VirusProtect-+
RAID-+
HSA-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon X4 750K and A10 Pro-7350B are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon X4 750K and A10 Pro-7350B. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1866DDR3-1600
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R6 Graphics
iGPU core countno data6
จำนวนพาธไลน์no data384
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Athlon X4 750K and A10 Pro-7350B integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Athlon X4 750K and A10 Pro-7350B integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon X4 750K and A10 Pro-7350B.

PCIe version2.03.0

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Athlon X4 750K 1.64
+54.7%
A10 Pro-7350B 1.06

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Athlon X4 750K 2879
+54.6%
Samples: 462
A10 Pro-7350B 1862
Samples: 154

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Athlon X4 750K 443
+54.9%
A10 Pro-7350B 286

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Athlon X4 750K 1029
+54.7%
A10 Pro-7350B 665

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.64 1.06
Recency 2 October 2012 4 June 2014
Chip lithography 32 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 19 Watt

Athlon X4 750K has a 54.7% higher aggregate performance score.

A10 Pro-7350B, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 426.3% lower power consumption.

The AMD Athlon X4 750K is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD A10 Pro-7350B in performance tests.

Note that Athlon X4 750K is a desktop processor while A10 Pro-7350B is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon X4 750K
Athlon X4 750K
AMD A10 Pro-7350B
A10 Pro-7350B

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 161 votes

Rate Athlon X4 750K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 36 votes

Rate A10 Pro-7350B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Athlon X4 750K and A10 Pro-7350B, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.