EPYC 7532 vs Athlon X2 QL-67
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 183 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | 2x AMD Athlon | AMD EPYC |
| Power efficiency | no data | 6.15 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Lion (2008−2009) | Zen 2 (2017−2020) |
| Release date | 1 September 2009 (16 years ago) | 19 February 2020 (5 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Athlon X2 QL-67 and EPYC 7532 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 64 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| Bus rate | 4000 MHz | no data |
| Multiplier | no data | 24 |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | 2 MB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 16 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 256 MB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 7 nm, 14 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon X2 QL-67 and EPYC 7532 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | S1g2 | Socket SP3 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 200 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon X2 QL-67 and EPYC 7532. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization | no data |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| PowerNow | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon X2 QL-67 and EPYC 7532 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon X2 QL-67 and EPYC 7532. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 4 TiB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 8 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 204.763 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 September 2009 | 19 February 2020 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 32 |
| Threads | 2 | 64 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 200 Watt |
Athlon X2 QL-67 has 471.4% lower power consumption.
EPYC 7532, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between AMD Athlon X2 QL-67 and AMD EPYC 7532. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Athlon X2 QL-67 is a notebook processor while EPYC 7532 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
