AMD Turion X2 RM-74 vs Athlon X2 QL-66

Buy
VS
Buy
Price now 5.99$
Games supported 30%
AMD Athlon X2 QL-66
AMD Athlon X2 QL-66
Buy
  • Interface
  • Core clock speed
  • Max video memory
  • Memory type
  • Memory clock speed
  • Maximum resolution
AMD Turion X2 RM-74
AMD Turion X2 RM-74
Buy
  • Interface
  • Core clock speed
  • Max video memory
  • Memory type
  • Memory clock speed
  • Maximum resolution
Price now 19.80$
Games supported 41%

General info

Comparing Athlon X2 QL-66 and Turion X2 RM-74 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rating26142557
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series2x AMD Athlon2x AMD Turion
Architecture codenameLion (2008−2009)Lion (2008−2009)
Release date1 September 2009 (13 years old)1 January 2009 (14 years old)
Current price$5.99 $19.80

Technical specs

Athlon X2 QL-66 and Turion X2 RM-74 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz2.2 GHz
Bus support3600 MHz3600 MHz
L1 cache256 KB256 KB
L2 cache1 MB1 MB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm65 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon X2 QL-66 and Turion X2 RM-74 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketS1g2S1
Thermal design power (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon X2 QL-66 and Turion X2 RM-74. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD VirtualizationMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization
PowerNow++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon X2 QL-66 and Turion X2 RM-74 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+

Benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Overall score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon X2 QL-66 0.51
Turion X2 RM-74 0.57
+11.8%
  • Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
  • Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
  • 3DMark06 CPU

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Athlon X2 QL-66 1695
Turion X2 RM-74 1740
+2.7%

Turion X2 RM-74 outperforms Athlon X2 QL-66 by 3% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Athlon X2 QL-66 3320
Turion X2 RM-74 3380
+1.8%

Turion X2 RM-74 outperforms Athlon X2 QL-66 by 2% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Athlon X2 QL-66 1520
Turion X2 RM-74 1561
+2.7%

Turion X2 RM-74 outperforms Athlon X2 QL-66 by 3% in 3DMark06 CPU.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance rating 0.51 0.57
Recency 1 September 2009 1 January 2009

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends

AMD Turion X2 RM-74
Turion X2 RM-74


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon X2 QL-66 and Turion X2 RM-74, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Competitors of Athlon X2 QL-66 by Intel

We believe that the nearest equivalent to Athlon X2 QL-66 by Intel is Core 2 Duo T5600, which is nearly equal in speed and higher by 6 positions in our rating.

Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 Core 2 Duo T5600
Compare

Here are some closest Intel rivals to Athlon X2 QL-66:

Athlon X2 QL-66 100

Competitors of Turion X2 RM-74 by Intel

We believe that the nearest equivalent to Turion X2 RM-74 by Intel is Celeron B815, which is nearly equal in speed and higher by 7 positions in our rating.

Intel Celeron B815 Celeron B815
Compare

Here are some closest Intel rivals to Turion X2 RM-74:

Turion X2 RM-74 100

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User rating

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 16 votes

Rate AMD Athlon X2 QL-66 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 17 votes

Rate AMD Turion X2 RM-74 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon X2 QL-66 or Turion X2 RM-74, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.