Ryzen 5 3500X vs Athlon X2 QL-65
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 5 3500X outperforms Athlon X2 QL-65 by a whopping 2040% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3260 | 1083 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | 2x AMD Athlon | AMD Ryzen 5 |
| Power efficiency | 0.42 | 4.87 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Lion (2008−2009) | Matisse (2019−2020) |
| Release date | 1 September 2009 (16 years ago) | 24 September 2019 (5 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Athlon X2 QL-65 and Ryzen 5 3500X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 6 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.1 GHz | 4.1 GHz |
| Bus rate | 3600 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | 384 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 3 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 32 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 4,800 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon X2 QL-65 and Ryzen 5 3500X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | S1g2 | AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon X2 QL-65 and Ryzen 5 3500X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | 65 nm, 1.075 - 1.125 | no data |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| PowerNow | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon X2 QL-65 and Ryzen 5 3500X are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon X2 QL-65 and Ryzen 5 3500X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 Dual-channel |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 128 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 51.196 GB/s |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.35 | 7.49 |
| Recency | 1 September 2009 | 24 September 2019 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 6 |
| Threads | 2 | 6 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 65 Watt |
Athlon X2 QL-65 has 85.7% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 5 3500X, on the other hand, has a 2040% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.
The AMD Ryzen 5 3500X is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Athlon X2 QL-65 in performance tests.
Be aware that Athlon X2 QL-65 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 5 3500X is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
