E2-3000 vs Athlon X2 QL-65

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon X2 QL-65
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.35

E2-3000 outperforms Athlon X2 QL-65 by a significant 20% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking33183218
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series2x AMD AthlonAMD E-Series
Power efficiency0.431.19
DesignerAMDAMD
Architecture codenameLion (2008−2009)Kabini (2013−2014)
Release date1 September 2009 (16 years ago)23 May 2013 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon X2 QL-65 and E2-3000 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz1.65 GHz
Bus rate3600 MHzno data
L1 cache256 KBno data
L2 cache1 MB1024 KB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm28 nm
Die sizeno data246 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data90 °C
Number of transistorsno data1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon X2 QL-65 and E2-3000 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketS1g2FT3
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon X2 QL-65 and E2-3000. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions65 nm, 1.075 - 1.12586x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX
AES-NI-+
FMA-FMA4
AVX-+
PowerNow++
PowerGating-+
VirusProtect-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon X2 QL-65 and E2-3000 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon X2 QL-65 and E2-3000. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3
Max memory channelsno data1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon HD 8280
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Athlon X2 QL-65 and E2-3000 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Athlon X2 QL-65 and E2-3000 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon X2 QL-65 and E2-3000.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Athlon X2 QL-65 0.35
E2-3000 0.42
+20%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Athlon X2 QL-65 609
E2-3000 743
+22%
Samples: 18

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.35 0.42
Recency 1 September 2009 23 May 2013
Chip lithography 65 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

E2-3000 has a 20% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 132.1% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

The AMD E2-3000 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Athlon X2 QL-65 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon X2 QL-65
Athlon X2 QL-65
AMD E2-3000
E2-3000

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.4 127 votes

Rate Athlon X2 QL-65 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 26 votes

Rate E2-3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Athlon X2 QL-65 and E2-3000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.