A4-3320M vs Athlon X2 QL-65

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon X2 QL-65
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.35

A4-3320M outperforms Athlon X2 QL-65 by a small 9% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking32693229
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series2x AMD AthlonAMD A-Series
Power efficiency0.420.46
DesignerAMDAMD
Architecture codenameLion (2008−2009)Llano (2011−2012)
Release date1 September 2009 (16 years ago)20 December 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon X2 QL-65 and A4-3320M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speedno data2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz2.6 GHz
Bus rate3600 MHzno data
L1 cache256 KB128 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data228 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon X2 QL-65 and A4-3320M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketS1g2FS1
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon X2 QL-65 and A4-3320M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions65 nm, 1.075 - 1.1253DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4a, Radeon HD 6480G
PowerNow+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon X2 QL-65 and A4-3320M are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon X2 QL-65 and A4-3320M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon HD 6480G (444 MHz)

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Athlon X2 QL-65 0.35
A4-3320M 0.38
+8.6%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Athlon X2 QL-65 609
A4-3320M 668
+9.7%
Samples: 37

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.35 0.38
Recency 1 September 2009 20 December 2011
Chip lithography 65 nm 32 nm

A4-3320M has a 8.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 103.1% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between AMD Athlon X2 QL-65 and AMD A4-3320M.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon X2 QL-65
Athlon X2 QL-65
AMD A4-3320M
A4-3320M

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.4 127 votes

Rate Athlon X2 QL-65 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 9 votes

Rate A4-3320M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Athlon X2 QL-65 and A4-3320M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.