Ryzen 5 5600H vs Athlon X2 QL-60

VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon X2 QL-60
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.34
Ryzen 5 5600H
2021
6 cores / 12 threads, 45 Watt
10.68
+3041%

Ryzen 5 5600H outperforms Athlon X2 QL-60 by a whopping 3041% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon X2 QL-60 and Ryzen 5 5600H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3056729
Place by popularitynot in top-10046
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series2x AMD AthlonAMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000)
Power efficiency0.9222.46
Architecture codenameLion (2008−2009)Cezanne-H (Zen 3) (2021)
Release date3 June 2008 (16 years ago)12 January 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon X2 QL-60 and Ryzen 5 5600H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads212
Base clock speedno data3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed1.9 GHz4.2 GHz
Bus rate3600 MHzno data
Multiplierno data33
L1 cache256 KB384 KB
L2 cache1 MB3 MB
L3 cache0 KB16 MB
Chip lithography65 nm7 nm
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Athlon X2 QL-60 and Ryzen 5 5600H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketS1FP6
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon X2 QL-60 and Ryzen 5 5600H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD VirtualizationMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
PowerNow+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon X2 QL-60 and Ryzen 5 5600H are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon X2 QL-60 and Ryzen 5 5600H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 7 ( - 1800 MHz)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon X2 QL-60 0.34
Ryzen 5 5600H 10.68
+3041%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon X2 QL-60 547
Ryzen 5 5600H 16961
+3001%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Athlon X2 QL-60 1273
Ryzen 5 5600H 5817
+357%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Athlon X2 QL-60 2803
Ryzen 5 5600H 34229
+1121%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Athlon X2 QL-60 1352
Ryzen 5 5600H 11952
+784%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.34 10.68
Recency 3 June 2008 12 January 2021
Physical cores 2 6
Threads 2 12
Chip lithography 65 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 45 Watt

Athlon X2 QL-60 has 28.6% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 5 5600H, on the other hand, has a 3041.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 5 5600H is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon X2 QL-60 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon X2 QL-60 and Ryzen 5 5600H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon X2 QL-60
Athlon X2 QL-60
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
Ryzen 5 5600H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 34 votes

Rate Athlon X2 QL-60 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 4588 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 5600H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon X2 QL-60 or Ryzen 5 5600H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.