Pentium 4 HT 651 vs Athlon X2 7550

VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon X2 7550 and Pentium 4 HT 651 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameKuma (2008−2009)Cedar Mill (2006)
Release dateDecember 2008 (16 years ago)January 2006 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon X2 7550 and Pentium 4 HT 651 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads22
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)28 KB
L2 cache512 KB (per core)2 MB
L3 cache2 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm65 nm
Die size285 mm281 mm2
Number of transistors450 million188 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon X2 7550 and Pentium 4 HT 651 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM2+775
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt86 Watt

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon X2 7550 and Pentium 4 HT 651 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon X2 7550 and Pentium 4 HT 651. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR1, DDR2, DDR3

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 1
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 86 Watt

Athlon X2 7550 has 100% more physical cores.

Pentium 4 HT 651, on the other hand, has 10.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Athlon X2 7550 and Pentium 4 HT 651. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon X2 7550 and Pentium 4 HT 651, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon X2 7550
Athlon X2 7550
Intel Pentium 4 HT 651
Pentium 4 HT 651

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 64 votes

Rate Athlon X2 7550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 15 votes

Rate Pentium 4 HT 651 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon X2 7550 or Pentium 4 HT 651, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.