Ryzen 9 6980HX vs Athlon Silver 3050U
Primary details
Comparing Athlon Silver 3050U and Ryzen 9 6980HX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 1969 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | AMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU) | AMD Rembrandt (Zen 3+) |
Power efficiency | 11.89 | no data |
Architecture codename | Dali (Zen) (2020) | Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022) |
Release date | 6 January 2020 (4 years ago) | January 2022 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Athlon Silver 3050U and Ryzen 9 6980HX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
Threads | 2 | 16 |
Base clock speed | 2.3 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 5 GHz |
Multiplier | 23 | no data |
L1 cache | 192 KB | 64K (per core) |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 512K (per core) |
L3 cache | 4 MB | 16 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 6 nm |
Die size | no data | 208 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 95 °C | 95 °C |
Number of transistors | 4500 Million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon Silver 3050U and Ryzen 9 6980HX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
Socket | FP5 | FP7 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 45 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon Silver 3050U and Ryzen 9 6980HX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME | MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA |
AES-NI | + | + |
FMA | + | - |
AVX | + | + |
Precision Boost 2 | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon Silver 3050U and Ryzen 9 6980HX are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon Silver 3050U and Ryzen 9 6980HX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR5 |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 38.397 GB/s | no data |
ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon RX Vega 2 | AMD Radeon 680M |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon Silver 3050U and Ryzen 9 6980HX.
PCIe version | 3.0 | 4.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 12 | 20 |
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 2 | 8 |
Threads | 2 | 16 |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 6 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 45 Watt |
Athlon Silver 3050U has 200% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 9 6980HX, on the other hand, has 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Athlon Silver 3050U and Ryzen 9 6980HX. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon Silver 3050U and Ryzen 9 6980HX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.