EPYC 9334 vs Athlon Silver 3050U

VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon Silver 3050U
2020
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
1.96
EPYC 9334
2022
32 cores / 64 threads, 210 Watt
42.37
+2062%

EPYC 9334 outperforms Athlon Silver 3050U by a whopping 2062% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon Silver 3050U and EPYC 9334 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking196762
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data10.86
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)AMD EPYC
Power efficiency11.9118.40
Architecture codenameDali (Zen) (2020)Genoa (2022−2023)
Release date6 January 2020 (4 years ago)10 November 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,990

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon Silver 3050U and EPYC 9334 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads264
Base clock speed2.3 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz2.7 GHz
Multiplier2327
L1 cache192 KB2 MB
L2 cache1 MB32 MB
L3 cache4 MB128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die sizeno data4x 72 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °Cno data
Number of transistors4500 Million52,560 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Athlon Silver 3050U and EPYC 9334 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
SocketFP5SP5
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt210 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon Silver 3050U and EPYC 9334. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEno data
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon Silver 3050U and EPYC 9334 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon Silver 3050U and EPYC 9334. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size32 GB6 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/s460.8 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon Silver 3050U and EPYC 9334.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes12128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon Silver 3050U 1.96
EPYC 9334 42.37
+2062%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon Silver 3050U 2992
EPYC 9334 64841
+2067%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.96 42.37
Recency 6 January 2020 10 November 2022
Physical cores 2 32
Threads 2 64
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 210 Watt

Athlon Silver 3050U has 1300% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9334, on the other hand, has a 2061.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 9334 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon Silver 3050U in performance tests.

Be aware that Athlon Silver 3050U is a notebook processor while EPYC 9334 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon Silver 3050U and EPYC 9334, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon Silver 3050U
Athlon Silver 3050U
AMD EPYC 9334
EPYC 9334

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2 8018 votes

Rate Athlon Silver 3050U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate EPYC 9334 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon Silver 3050U or EPYC 9334, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.