EPYC 9135 vs Athlon PRO 300U

VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon PRO 300U
2019
2 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
2.57
EPYC 9135
2024
16 cores / 32 threads, 200 Watt
36.56
+1323%

EPYC 9135 outperforms Athlon PRO 300U by a whopping 1323% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon PRO 300U and EPYC 9135 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking174496
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data29.27
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD Athlonno data
Power efficiency16.2117.30
Architecture codenameRaven Ridge 2 (2019)Turin (2024)
Release date8 April 2019 (5 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,214

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon PRO 300U and EPYC 9135 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads432
Base clock speed2.4 GHz3.65 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz4.3 GHz
Bus typePCIe 3.0no data
Multiplier24no data
L1 cache128K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm4 nm
Die size209.78 mm22x 70.6 mm2
Number of transistors4940 Million16,630 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Athlon PRO 300U and EPYC 9135 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketFP5SP5
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon PRO 300U and EPYC 9135. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTno data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon PRO 300U and EPYC 9135 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon PRO 300U and EPYC 9135. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR5
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1000 MHz)N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon PRO 300U and EPYC 9135.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes12128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon PRO 300U 2.57
EPYC 9135 36.56
+1323%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon PRO 300U 4080
EPYC 9135 58070
+1323%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.57 36.56
Recency 8 April 2019 10 October 2024
Physical cores 2 16
Threads 4 32
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 200 Watt

Athlon PRO 300U has 1233.3% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9135, on the other hand, has a 1322.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 9135 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon PRO 300U in performance tests.

Be aware that Athlon PRO 300U is a notebook processor while EPYC 9135 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon PRO 300U and EPYC 9135, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon PRO 300U
Athlon PRO 300U
AMD EPYC 9135
EPYC 9135

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Athlon PRO 300U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9135 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon PRO 300U or EPYC 9135, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.