Xeon E-2478 vs Athlon PRO 300GE

Aggregate performance score

Athlon PRO 300GE
2019
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
2.81
Xeon E-2478
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 80 Watt
19.49
+594%

Xeon E-2478 outperforms Athlon PRO 300GE by a whopping 594% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon PRO 300GE and Xeon E-2478 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1691311
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data82.50
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Athlonno data
Power efficiency7.3222.22
Architecture codenameZen+ (2018−2019)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date30 September 2019 (5 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$568

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon PRO 300GE and Xeon E-2478 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads416
Base clock speedno data2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz5.2 GHz
Bus rateno data16 GT/s
Multiplier34no data
L1 cache192 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography12 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size209.78 mm2257 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors4950 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Athlon PRO 300GE and Xeon E-2478 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketSocket AM4FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt80 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon PRO 300GE and Xeon E-2478. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

Athlon PRO 300GE and Xeon E-2478 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon PRO 300GE and Xeon E-2478 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon PRO 300GE and Xeon E-2478. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size64 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 3N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon PRO 300GE and Xeon E-2478.

PCIe versionno data5
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon PRO 300GE 2.81
Xeon E-2478 19.49
+594%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon PRO 300GE 4308
Xeon E-2478 29827
+592%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.81 19.49
Recency 30 September 2019 14 December 2023
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 4 16
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 80 Watt

Athlon PRO 300GE has 128.6% lower power consumption.

Xeon E-2478, on the other hand, has a 593.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

The Xeon E-2478 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon PRO 300GE in performance tests.

Note that Athlon PRO 300GE is a desktop processor while Xeon E-2478 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon PRO 300GE and Xeon E-2478, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon PRO 300GE
Athlon PRO 300GE
Intel Xeon E-2478
Xeon E-2478

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 113 votes

Rate Athlon PRO 300GE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon E-2478 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon PRO 300GE or Xeon E-2478, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.