Ryzen 5 4600G vs Athlon PRO 300GE

VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon PRO 300GE
2019
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
2.71
Ryzen 5 4600G
2020
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
10.10
+273%

Ryzen 5 4600G outperforms Athlon PRO 300GE by a whopping 273% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon PRO 300GE and Ryzen 5 4600G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1710772
Place by popularitynot in top-10031
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD AthlonAMD Ryzen 5
Power efficiency7.3314.71
Architecture codenameZen+ (2018−2019)Renoir (2020−2023)
Release date30 September 2019 (5 years ago)21 July 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon PRO 300GE and Ryzen 5 4600G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads412
Base clock speedno data3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz4.2 GHz
Multiplier3437
L1 cache192 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache4 MB8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography12 nm7 nm
Die size209.78 mm2156 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
Number of transistors4950 Million9800 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Athlon PRO 300GE and Ryzen 5 4600G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketSocket AM4AM4
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon PRO 300GE and Ryzen 5 4600G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon PRO 300GE and Ryzen 5 4600G are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon PRO 300GE and Ryzen 5 4600G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size64 GB128 GB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/s51.196 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon Vega 3AMD Radeon Vega 7

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon PRO 300GE and Ryzen 5 4600G.

PCIe versionno data3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon PRO 300GE 2.71
Ryzen 5 4600G 10.10
+273%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon PRO 300GE 4308
Ryzen 5 4600G 16047
+272%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Athlon PRO 300GE 937
Ryzen 5 4600G 1581
+68.7%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Athlon PRO 300GE 1911
Ryzen 5 4600G 6122
+220%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.71 10.10
Integrated graphics card 2.98 7.47
Recency 30 September 2019 21 July 2020
Physical cores 2 6
Threads 4 12
Chip lithography 12 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 65 Watt

Athlon PRO 300GE has 85.7% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 5 4600G, on the other hand, has a 272.7% higher aggregate performance score, 150.7% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 9 months, 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 71.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 5 4600G is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon PRO 300GE in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon PRO 300GE and Ryzen 5 4600G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon PRO 300GE
Athlon PRO 300GE
AMD Ryzen 5 4600G
Ryzen 5 4600G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 116 votes

Rate Athlon PRO 300GE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 2771 vote

Rate Ryzen 5 4600G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon PRO 300GE or Ryzen 5 4600G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.